Should churches have carpet in the sanctuary and should there be padded seating?
Here is our latest video on this important issue.
Here are the details of how those values came to be.
The standard for a worship space to have a signal to noise ratio of 20 to 25dB and a flat response from 80 to 8000 Hertz comes from studying worship styles and working on hundreds of Churches. First, you have to look at all of the various elements of worship. They include:
Main Elements (Based on Scriptures and by Jesus Example)
Reading of Scripture
Preaching and Sermons
Questions and Answers
Prayer
Celebration of communion
Congregational singing
Offerings
Secondary Elements (items that churches have added to worship after the reformation period.)
Choir or choral music
Music to support congregational singing
Music lead by a worship team
Announcements
Sharing of testimonies
Sharing of prayer requests
Singing performances
Music performances
Music Rehearsals
Child participation
Congregational meetings
Event Elements (non-worship uses of a sanctuary.)
Weddings
Funerals
Teaching Events
Conferences
Concerts
Fundraising events
Music Lessons
These are all of the main elements of how the church sanctuary is used over its lifetime. Not all churches will practice these elements, but the first seven elements in the main portion are universal. Now here is an aspect that is least understood. If you have the ideal acoustic conditions for the first seven elements, the worship space can support all of the other elements that all churches will practice at one time or another.
Whether a new church, after a church renovation or when converting a commercial building into a new church, the sound system is susceptible to humidity changes. The speed of sound changes as humidity changes. Learn about how humidity affects the performance of a church sound system and what you can do to keep your system in peak performance.
When it comes to houses of worship, there is one fundamental question that Christians need to be honest with themselves. Do we design houses of worship based on what we needor what we want? The evidence that we can see and hear as a person visits houses of worship is that Churches are designed and built around what they want, and after they move in, they expect the building to give them what they need. Many Churches seem to spend unlimited amounts of money after they move in to make the room give them what they need, and the results almost always come up short.
Since the edict of tolerance by Emperor Constantine, there has been a search for the perfect house of worship. It is supposed to be an ideal place for Christians to gather, hear the scriptures, study the Gospel and sing praises to God. After building millions of churches around the world since then, that perfect worship space has been elusive. When it comes to worship space design, it looks like the church is following a world view of thinking, which is similar to those who believe in evolutionism, materialism and atheism. The evolutionist believes that if we keep building enough churches with random designs, we will eventually get it right over an endless period of time. The materialist believes that there is a yet to be discovered equation that can explain to us how to create the perfect sound for worship. The atheist believes that we can design churches without needing God. Not one of these world view designs has created a building that meets all of the needs of Christian Worship as detailed in the Bible. Yet, every church, church board, and building committee prays to God for help in designing new worship spaces, but they don’t turn to God’s Word for answers as part of the process. No one is answering the question of whether we are to design for what we needor what we want!
Why are Christians looking for answers to this problem outside of the Bible, the book that changed their lives? The Bible, a timeless book, has a design for a house of worship that does give the Christian church everything that they need – yes, even in these modern times. The Bible teaches that the scriptures are sufficient to give us what we need and not what we want. God is our loving heavenly Father, who wants to take care of His children. GOD gave us a blueprint pattern to follow, which was designed by HIM through David in the Old Testament. It is a perfect space for Christian Worship today. Shouldn’t the Christian community follow the Bible in what we needas a house of worship and leave the idea of what we want to our personal lives?
Almost every church has a sound system. It is supposed to be a tool to preach the Gospel message with. When that goal is achieved, it turns out that such a sound system is also excellent for the singing portion of the worship. In a survey done a few years ago, most church sound systems failed at meeting all of the requirements for worship. During the survey, approximately 90% of the worship spaces were limiting the performance of the sound system. In some cases, where churches had expensive “State of the Art” sound systems with the latest digital technology, the acoustical condition of the room limited the performance of the sound systems to 70% or less.
These sound systems were limited in many ways, including even when the congregation can sing over 85dB, but if the sound system was even louder than 83dB, people vigorously complained that the sound system was too loud. Other issues included the need for expensive drum shields, which can cost thousands. Many churches are turning to In-Ear Monitors, and all of the hardware needed to go with the system that cost thousands. In many churches, they were limited in the number of open microphones that could be used, or everyone had to have headset microphones and so on. What is also distressing is that most churches are investing more money into technology and replacing the technology in cycles of 15 years or less- long before the equipment is worn out or obsolete.
What would happen if you could fix the acoustics of the worship space permanently with an acoustical system that can be repainted in future renovations to last the lifetime of the church building? What if that permanent fix could get 90 to 100% performance out of your existing sound system or any future system expansion? What would happen if you only needed to replace sound equipment whenever it failed because of age, rather than trying out the latest technology? What does the latest technology get you in a room that is underperforming acoustically? Does investing into the newest hyped up devices, making promises that can only be reached if the room is fixed in the first place, do anything to help people understand the Gospel better, or is it better to just pacify people through a better entertainment quality sound system? What happens if we turn to the Bible to look for answers? The only example of a worship space is in the details of Solomon’s Temple. That was an edifice that was built over 3500 years ago, and if it was truly The House of God, then why did God allow it to be destroyed?
Is there any proof or evidence that if a church is designed like Solomon’s Temple as it is detailed in the Bible, it would not be suitable for modern worship today? Are there any existing churches that have the same details of Solomon’s Temple, less the gold? If there is, how does it sound? If no place exists, then why isn’t there at least one? Does Solomon’s Temple have anything to offer modern churches today? How can a building that some say is just a myth, a building that is said to have never existed, be relevant today? What could ancient technology possibly be usable in an ultra-modern church? Was there something that was in Solomon’s Temple that is usable in churches today, even if the modern church doesn’t resemble anything close to Solomon’s Temple? If the technology of Solomon’s Temple is transferable into existing churches, what does it say about the existence of Solomon’s Temple? Can a myth fix modern churches? Has any of this technology been applied to existing churches?
Jesus gave us the last supper, the communion that all Christians celebrate. By that example, shouldn’t we follow the example of how to design a house of worship that Jesus designed – if we believe John 1:3 “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made”? Why do churches go against what Jesus did for us in this issue? After all, Jesus is alive today. Why do we treat Jesus as someone who is exclusively from the past? When did Jesus and God stop being in the present?
In the Gospel of John, it begins with “in the beginning was the WORD and the Word was with God.” This is about the past and how all things came to be. At the end of the Gospel, after Jesus rose from the dead, John said, (John 20:31) “but these have been written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name.” Here, John clearly makes a transition where Jesus in not just the Son of God in the past, but is the Son of God in the present.
As a Christian, the teaching is that the whole Bible is the Word of God. The Bible is the word of God for the past – lessons from which to learn from; for the present – how we are to live day to day with God today; and for the future – to know where we go when we die and how the future of the world will be. Every part of the Bible has something to teach us today, and that includes what we should know about Solomon’s Temple. Was the destruction of Solomon’s Temple of God’s failure to protect His House, or was it to tell us that the details of Solomon’s Temple has valuable technology that is meant to be used in all churches after Jesus rose from the dead? Here is a link that teaches about how Solomon’s Temple is relevant to churches today.
Here is a link to photo albums of over 40, of the 400 plus churches that have already applied this ancient technology of Solomon’s Temple with amazing results. Any church can benefit from this technology today. The cost of such a system that can help save lives is priceless, but it is possible to add it to all churches, especially when it costs less than a typical sound system upgrade or replacement.
Please leave any comments you might have in the comment section below.
Jesus would build exactly what he has already designed for us. Christian don’t follow what Jesus designed because most view anything from the Old Testament as something that is irrelevant today. That is from the old covenant. Oh!
In the New Testament, Jesus did not hint or suggest how houses of worship or churches should be designed, or did he? In Matthew 5:17 Jesus said “Do not think that I came to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I did not come to abolish but to fulfill.” Next we have to look at John 1:3 “All things came into being through Him, and apart from Him nothing came into being that has come into being.” When you read the first 5 verses of the Gospel of John, he is talking about Jesus. Jesus was there for creation, and all things were created through Jesus. Then when you skip to 1 Chronicles 28:19, King David told his son, Solomon, that it was the hand of God that guided him in the design of the temple. God also made him to understand what was being designed. When you put the other parts together, beginning with all things were created through Jesus, and nothing was created without Him, then that means it was Jesus who guided the hand of King David.
As a relic from the past, I can understand why people are so fascinated about Solomon’s Temple. The Ark of the Covenant, the gold on all of the walls and floor, and the gold covering the two giant sized Cherubs over the Ark of the Covenant. It all seems too good to be true, or is it? Since the temple was built and destroyed, many scholars, scientists and historians have been either, trying to validate its existence, seeking something spiritual, or think that there is something supernatural about the building. There are also people waiting in the sidelines for the chance to rebuild another temple. They all have their reasons, but most of them believe that there will be some kind of restoration, and building a third temple will move revelations forward. When man decides to build the third temple in Jerusalem, will not change God’s timing for future events. God will decide that and the unsaved people of the world will have one more chance to change where they will spend eternity.
When you think about it, the second temple, which was built with the best of intentions, was turned into an atrocity and few hundred years later. The temple was symbolizing all of the corruption and enslavement of the Israelites who were beaten into submission by the heavy burden of legalism enforced by the Priests, Pharisees, Sadducees, and scribes, long before the Roman Empire ruled Israel. When the Romans arrived, the religious leaders simply added some more rules to keep the peace with their new roman masters.
When you put it all together, Jesus designed the temple Solomon built. When you look at the temple from the perspective that Jesus designed it, then you should be asking the questions Why, and does it have relevancy today?
The knowledge of Solomon’s Temple that I am exposing has nothing to do with anything mysterious, supernatural or any mysticism. When Jesus cast the money changers out of the temple, he said “My House” in Matthew and Mark and said My Father’s House in John. Jesus said that the temple was His and His Father’s house. This was a copy, and a poor quality version compared to the first temple. Did Jesus claim this house because it was dedicated as God’s house or did He claim ownership because of where it was located?
For those who have come to realize this truth, Jesus didn’t have to give us a new church design in the New Testament. He already gave us that in the Old Testament, and when Jesus said he came to fulfill the law, I think he was also saying that anything that was designed in the past is a gift for us today. This may seem like a stretch, until you start applying modern science to Solomon’s Temple. You know – the temple Jesus designed.
Wait a second, are you saying that modern churches should be designed like Solomon’s Temple? Are you out of your mind? Who can afford such a building – consider this. When you remove the gold, you have the most compatible worship space to modern Christian Worship. They building method of the temple in modern times is a very affordable building that includes all the space a typical church these days needs. Ok then, are all churches going to look the same? The Holy Place or sanctuary portion of the temple is a roadmap that should not be compromised. How you design the rest of the building is up to you. Why would we want to design such a space? Perhaps it is because it is the ideal space to have the best worship experience possible on earth before going to heaven. It could be the closest thing to heaven we can experience here on earth, but we don’t know for sure because there is no building around that is completely designed that way.
Consider this, most church buildings cannot physically support all of the worship, detailed in the Bible in both the Old and New Testament, however, Solomon’s Temple, without the gold can. (There are already hundreds of churches that are using sound management from the Bible that suggests that Solomon’s design would perform even better.) Jesus had to have designed Solomon’s Temple. Why? So it can lay in a pile of dirt under a Mosque? Why else would Jesus guide the hand of David? What was so important in the design of the temple for the only man in History, David, to be touched by God? Many in the Bible have seen or been touched by Angels, but is was different for King David. The reason why it was Jesus that touched David, is because Jesus had touched people later on in the New Testament. Not even Moses or anyone else had such an experience until Jesus came to us in the flesh years later. Jesus said He came to fulfill the law. He had to, because He wrote them. It is possible that Solomon’s Temple was meant to be a gift for us to use today? Isn’t it time that we study God’s Word from a different perspective and embrace that gift and start experiencing church worship as God wants for us, or have we been too prideful and sinful to recognize His teachings, even when it comes from the Old Testament?
For those of you who think that Solomon’s Temple was a myth, how does a myth fix the performance of sound systems and acoustics in over 400 modern churches today? How many churches have to be fixed before using the methods from the Bible are considered standard practice in the Christian Church Community?
To learn of these secrets, have a look at this PDF file and let me know what you think.
Diffusers are amazing tools when used properly in a church. They solve a variety of problems in one step. Nothing performs better.
One question that is often asked, can you turn the diffusers sideways? This is a great question, and the answer is based on our anatomy. As humans, our ears are on the side of our heads. This means we get our sound information for direction and clarity of speech on the horizontal plane or side to side. The time difference between our ears give us directional info to identify where a sound is coming from, and for speech, it helps us to focus on someone talking to us.
For diffusers to work correctly and to solve multiple problems in one step, their orientation is critical. When applied vertically, the diffusers can solve between 10 – 29 acoustical issues in one step. No other acoustical system can do this.
The problems solved or reduced are:
standing waves
deadspots
hotspots
eliminate echoes
eliminate flutter echoes
bass build-up,
speech intelligibility,
increases the signal to noise ratio up to 25dB throughout the room
eliminate or less floor monitor spill,
less sound system distortion
less bass distortion
helps to equalize the bass and mid frequencies
gain before feedback,
even distribution of sound,
elimination of delayed speakers in most cases,
better stereo imaging for stereo sounds (when the right equipment is used)
higher attention span,
makes the room easier for the musicians to perform
improved sound for people with hearing aids
better congregational singing
easier for the sound-person to get an excellent mix
it can reduce or eliminate the need for drum shields or both
makes the room less fatiguing for the minister to preach
fewer to no complaints if the sound system is louder
improves the sonic quality of the sound system
can add up to an octave of clear bass from the sound system
better bass from musical instruments both acoustic and amplified
it helps to make the room more relaxing to hear speech and music.
lowers the sound levels from HVAC systems
If your church has a pipe organ, you will want to know this. One of the most interesting characteristics we have learned with using this method is that for some churches that want to maintain a longer reverberation time, plus have all of the benefits of better speech quality, the half-round tubes can increase speech intelligibility without changing the reverberation time. No other acoustical system can do that. For churches that have a pipe or electronic organ and want better speech quality, this method allows a church to balance the need for music and speech.
When diffusers are installed horizontally, the list of benefits is much shorter.
standing waves,
bass build-up,
Helps to equalize the bass and mid frequencies
It can add up to an octave of clear bass from the sound system and musical instruments.
Can only reduce echoes, not eliminate them
There is more to these differences. Because we have ears on the sides of our heads, the rate of control is exponential when the diffusers are mounted vertically. One of the principals of how these diffusers work is by phase cancellation, which is the same technique as in noise-canceling headsets. The more random the sounds are scattered, the more the overall energy is canceled from the physics principle of phase cancellation. As a result, when mounted vertically, the diffusers can get up to 40dB of energy reductions or absorption by air friction. When you mount the diffusers horizontally, you will only get about 10dB of the overall reduction.
The reason horizontally mounted tubes are less effective is because you are creating large reflective surfaces on the horizontal plane that reflects enough energy back into the room, which it is adding noise back to the listener that in turn, reduces the signal to noise ratio. This cancels almost all of the benefits of using half round diffusers horizontally.
Here is a simple experiment you can do yourself. Find a round container that is at least 7 to 8 inches round. You can every use a large cooking pot, planter, or roll up some cardboard. Now say a bunch of words into the side of the container vertically. After talking for about 15 seconds, turn the container sideways, and talk for another 15 seconds.
What just happened? Like most people, they notice that when the container was horizontal or sideways, there is a distinct reflection. When you turn the container vertically, the reflection goes away.
This simple experiment demonstrates how powerful the half-round shape is. In the vertical position, when the half rounds are placed on a wall in groups, you can adjust the spacing between the tubes to determine how much reflection you want, plus shape and equalize the sound at the same time. This is a compelling way to manage church sound once you understand how effective and simple this system works.
Just as a reminder, for all churches, you have to have a balance between absorption and reflection. The half-round tubes are not always a one and done solution. It has to be part of an integrated system. Typically, for most churches, if you have carpeted floors and padded seating, that is often all the absorption needed. If your church doesn’t have carpet and padded seating, then you will have to add enough absorption to the walls to match what would be on the floor. That is a narrow window to get it just right.
For churches that play their music loud, some people wait in the foyer until the sermon starts or they wear hearing protection during the music portion of the worship service. With the half round system, it allows the sound system to perform 10 to 20dB louder with fewer people needing hearing protection. People turn to hearing protection when there is too much distortion in the sound. A distorted sound is irritating and painful to many. People turn to hearing protection, even when the sound levels are well below 85dBa. When a room is diffused properly with half rounds, it reduces or eliminates bass and mid-range distortion. With distortion out of the way, the sound at 85dBa becomes pleasant and easy to listen to. That pleasantness remains constant over 100dBc. Consider this – in a church with this kind of acoustical system with the right room shape and height, it is common for un-amplified congregational singing to be around 100dBc. When that happens almost no one complains. Why? Because there is no distortion. Half-round diffusers prevent distortion. This transforms any worship space into a music-friendly space at any sound level.
Church acoustics and amplified sound play a significant roll in the health of a church. When sound is good, it helps to grow the congregation. When sound is bad, it gets in the way of providing a clear message, that leads to less attendance which means fewer people tithing. In the end, there is nothing more important than preaching the Gospel in the best clarity possible.
To ultimately answer the question of Aesthetics vs performance, the smart answer is this. When an acoustical system works, people don’t mind how it looks. If anything, they grow to like it. When other acoustical systems are used, they often fall short on the expected and promised performance. As a result, those systems become more like wall furniture and in some cases, artwork. This drives up the cost of those systems. Here is the truth most experts and salespeople will never share or admit. To get the equivalent performance of the half-round tubes as a Do It Yourself project compared to ready-made products, the cost difference is 35 to 1. A church that fixes their acoustics with cardboard tubes as a DIY including paint and hardware for a 400 seat church may spend $2,000.00 installed. A ready-made system of equal performance will cost a minimum of 75,000.00 installed. That is equal to fixing 35 churches of the same size. Even if the same church buys custom made half-round diffusers, they may spend $20,000. When compared to other acoustical system costs, that is enough money to fix 3 churches.
There is something to be said about how people react to anything put on the walls. When people see cloth-covered panels, there is an expectation of good sound. When that doesn’t happen, people often resign to the notion that the problem is too complicated and too expensive to be properly fixed or that the problem is impossible to fix. Most people just put up with the problem and accept it as normal and don’t bother with complaining. That is a lie created by bad information and myths that keep churches from getting the sound they deserve. Sound excellence is a necessity, not an option.
When an acoustical system works, people don’t mind how it looks. When it doesn’t work as promised, it has to look amazing. Do you want a church that looks good and has fewer people attending or a church that is full all the time regardless of how it looks?
Sound system design has nothing to do with the equipment you use. It is about the location of speakers used to broadcast into a room and the interaction of the room with the speaker system design. It doesn’t matter if you are using line arrays or point-and-shoot speakers. If speakers are placed in the wrong position, both systems will have the same limitations. It is all about cause and effect. A sound engineer needs detailed knowledge, experience, and wisdom in understanding room acoustics or when to know enough to ask help from an acoustician to understand when to use which system. Did you know that the room will tell you where the best places are to put speakers?
The room will tell you when to use one of the following techniques:
Distributed Sound System
Central Cluster or single speaker system
Left Center Right system or cluster
Left Right System
Live Stereo Hybrid System
Hybrid Distributed Sound System
The geometry, reverberation, surface materials, acoustical management system, and room volume must be accounted for before creating a sound system design profile. After all of this is done, you can start to determine the size of the sound system needed.
If you think you need to do some acoustic treatment or the church has already been treated, it should not be using the spot treatment method, which means placing a few panels on a wall or two. Adding something to one wall or any part of a wall affects the whole room. This also includes the placement of screens, lighting, and other items related to multimedia. Even room renovations change how a room sounds. It is all about cause and effect. The acoustics of a church must use a planned system that treats the whole room.
A spot fix is when enough panels are added to solve one problem. When there is a problem in acoustics, there are always other glitches that mask other difficulties that you can’t hear and often are not shown in acoustical measurements. Here is an example: Placing sound absorbers on a balcony’s front face will eliminate an echo. However, the added absorption often strengthens the mids and bass, making speech and music sound muddier. This then requires adding expensive bass traps. While you can use aggressive equalization to improve the sound system for speech, you will need a different equalization for music. While these efforts can somewhat help with amplified sound, as long as someone remembers to switch the EQ settings, the congregational singing is degraded until bass traps are added. Add the bass traps. It is all about cause and effect.
However, you may have noticed that after treating the front face of the balcony and adding the bass traps, there is now a softer echo off the back wall, or the reflections off the side walls are much worse depending on the shape of the room. Reflections off the side walls are detected when clapping from the front of the center stage. Those reflections from the sides or back interfere with speech and music intelligibility. It is all about cause and effect. Change the EQ of the sound system. Helps with speech but doesn’t help with music at all. Despite changes to the sound system, speech is worse in the back half of the room. Add speakers to the back half of the room. It helps people with good hearing and doesn’t help with hearing aids. Add a delay to the speakers. People with hearing aids do better, but they are still not happy because someone is sitting in their spot where they know the sound is better.
If you apply something to the sidewalls, the echo off the back wall becomes much more pronounced and interferes with hearing on stage. Switch to in-ear monitors. It’s all about cause and effect.
Now the drums are too loud. Add panels to the stage or get a drum shield that costs more than fixing all of the acoustical problems in one step. With the drum shield, the drummer plays louder because they can’t hear themselves properly. The insides of the drum enclosures are easily overloaded, making it harder for the drummer to hear all the different drums and cymbals. After additional dampening to the drums, the drummer played even louder, getting elbow and wrist injuries. Sound is still bleeding through the shield, even after adding a roof to it. Some churches have turned the drum shield into a self-contained room with air-conditioning as a permanent fixture on the stage. It is all about cause and effect.
For the time being, congregational singing has become a chore for most, resulting in less than 20% of the audience singing. To get people singing again, you pay singers and musicians to lead the worship and keep the talent sticking with the music entertainment program. This helps for a while, and before long, you are back to less than 20% of the audience singing. Bring in larger screens, add lighting effects, and use lighting to help create a mode to encourage people to sing. Again, this helps for a while, but participation drops back to 20%. These objects change the acoustics of the room, and everyone just puts up with the sound degradation. It’s all about cause and effect.
In the meantime, the sound system has been replaced, and church attendance is up, but fewer people come to prayer meetings or Bible studies. Turn to home groups. At first, home groups bring in more people, but as the church continues to grow, more people are slipping through the system and are not included in the home groups or any spiritual support. Fewer people are growing as there is no alternative for mid-week meetings at the church. The preaching is dynamic; the entertainment is awesome, fewer people are actively involved in the church, and more people become adherents with no real motivation to join, become members, and learn more about their faith. The church is full of Sunday worshipers unable to defend the Gospel, but they know and sing the choruses sung by the church all the time. It is about being part of something free of guilt, responsibility, and not knowing what salvation is. It’s all about cause and effect.
Wait a minute, what does any of this have to do with acoustics and sound system? The sound system is just equipment and technology. The room is just a set of walls, floor, and ceiling. When empty, they do nothing. When energized with sound, an immediate cause and effect impact every part of the worship service. Sound affects how people react to events in a church. Consider how people respond to movies at a theatre. When the sound is excellent, the audience will tell you how good the picture looks. When the sound is poor, people don’t come back. How much more does that impact a church? Again, it’s all about cause and effect.
Next, check the acoustical condition of your church. Have your church properly tested for all aspects of worship, not just the sound system and hardware performance. Test for congregational singing. Test for audience participation for prayer and testimonies from the seating area of your church. Check for the signal-to-noise ratio on the stage and in the audience. Check the frequency response of the room and ignore the reverberation time if there is more than a 20dB difference in the response of the worship space. If your worship space passes, then you don’t need any help. Your sound system is already working perfectly. If you have any concerns or want better performance from your sound system, fix the room. It’s all about cause and effect.
After upgrading the sound system and worship space, start mid-week Bible Studies at the church. The congregation will become stronger and healthier if people come to the church mid-week. Congratulations, you have just upgraded your church’s sound to meet all a congregation’s needs.
The story you have just read happens in many churches. It is based on the testimonies of hundreds of churches around the world. If this doesn’t sound like your church, have your worship space tested anyway if it hasn’t ever been properly tested. The results can be a surprise or a blessing.
The Bible has a lot to say about how a modern church should be designed. Solomon’s Temple was not just a house for God to dwell in, it was also meant to be a tool to help preach and spread the Gospel in the present.
After reading this article, please pass it on and make comments below.
This article is the most comprehensive study of King Solomon’s Temple I have ever written. If you believe John 1:3, then you know who really designed Solomon’s Temple. King David only penned the details of the new temple. King David told his son Solomon that it was the hand of God that guided his hand. What was so important for God to design the temple rather than letting a man design in with whatever came into his thought?
This article gives a stronger case for what the “Inspired Word of God” means.
Winning people to Christ is not a game or something given to chance. We need all the tools possible to have an impact on this world. Jesus is Lord, and if your church is dedicated to God, Jesus is Lord over your church building too.
Congregational singing is perhaps the third most important part of worship. Prayer and preaching of the Gospel come first and second. In many church publications and websites, there are many articles about how to improve congregational singing. When you say improve congregational singing, what are you truly asking for? In almost every case, they are asking how to get more people to sing. And the theory is, that the more people are singing, the more they will be engaged. The means of how they attempt this is with a high power sound system and strong leadership of the lead singer in a praise band. You never hear them suggesting to fix the room.
Here are some of those titles.
7 Tips To Encourage Singing in Your Church – Gavin Adams
Nine Reasons People Aren’t Singing in Worship
12 Things to Avoid for Better Congregational Singing
Fifty Ways to Guarantee Poor Congregational Singing
How to improve congregational singing: 4 suggestions to …
A Simple Way to Improve Congregational Singing: Get Rid of the Carpet
There are many more.
The ideas recommended are extraordinary, and most of the time, they are putting the bulk of the load on the church leaders, including the pastors and song leaders. This is so wrong. The truth is, all of the recommendations outlined are the results of trying to put a square peg into a round hole. There is a simple solution to all of this. When you read the articles, what church leaders are doing is a direct result of compensating for poor acoustical conditions. Choosing the right keys to sing in, choosing a better selection of songs, hiring professional singers, and performers, in the end, it only helps things slightly. The thing is, what the audience keeps telling me is that when they are singing, they feel like they are singing alone, it creates a sense of loneliness. People feel as if no matter how loud they were singing, their efforts have no contribution to the overall volume of the congregation. When you can’t even hear yourself, most people just give up and don’t bother singing. Some may just mouth the words.
Sure, there are times when we see people at a concert singing a particular song, and it sounds impressive, but the reality is, those people will not sing the whole show at that volume. It is more about having an emotional high and nothing more. It is doing something to capture a moment for personal gratification and bragging rights. That is not worshiping in any sense of the word.
My take on how to get the congregation to sing is by first identifying the source of why people don’t sing in your church. In 90% of the churches that I have helped solve their congregational singing issue, it has always been around one reason – acoustics. Here is some background you should know.
This is a new church with diffusers built into the walls. The quality of this room is such that when this photo was taken, the congregation drowned out the Pipe Organ. The organist said he pulled all the stops and he could not hear the organ for some of the songs they sang. At one point he stopped playing. With a sound meter recorder at the pulpit, the congregation hit 105dB several times and no one complained that it was too loud.
The struggles of congregational singing started long before the sound system was invented. It is my belief that Choirs were formed originally, because when Christians first started to worship in existing pagan temples, (after the edict of tolerance,) most likely, those temples had such poor acoustics that the congregations back then had the same problem of not hearing themselves. Then some talented singers found that if they stood in a particular part of a room, they could hear themselves and create an awesome sound of choral singing within the pagan temple. That talent was later included as part of the worship. When Christians started to build churches, when the buildings were finished, they asked the better singers to go to the part of the worship space where their voices were effective in creating this big sound where a few people would sound like many.
In the end, as more and more churches were built, the choir became the focus of congregational singing, and even though the congregation was encouraged to sing, the choir was the focus, not the congregation. This continued throughout church history in one form or another. Sure, some large cathedrals have these amazing sound effects. (Sound effects do not support congregational singing or speech.) Still, in the end, it is the choir and the organ that dominated worship, not authentic worship singing or hearing the Gospel.
Throughout the Reformation period to today, churches have been experimenting with worship space designs to discover the Rosetta stone of church acoustics. Churches have been trying to create a worship space without any acoustical planning. It hasn’t happened yet that we know of and if there is a church out there that works, where is it? Why would it be kept as a secret? When the room helps the singing of the congregation, the congregation will sing, and they will sing as loud as they are inspired to. The same properties that makes congregational singing work, speech will be equally as good. Around the world if there are such churches that have the proper balance of sound, for speech and congregational singing, why has no one documented these jewels or studied them to see what makes those churches better than others. No one has made permanent records for future churches to follow.
It seems that when a church gets known for its musical performance quality, it usually suffers from speech, and for years people have been brainwashed into believing that you can’t have a worship space that is good for both speech and music. That comment is true, for a musical performance space or concert hall. This is not what a church needs. A church needs a room to support congregational singing, not musical performances.
When I get hired to fix a church, one comment that is repeated often is, we can’t afford or don’t want a concert hall. That is the whole point. You don’t want a concert hall, and it would be detrimental to a church to have such a space. Concert halls do not support congregational singing, none of them do. Concert halls are awful for speech. If you look at most concert halls today, when it comes to speech, they close curtains, expose absorption panels, and they rely on costly sound systems to broadcast speech events. Concert halls are either-or spaces. They cannot support speech and music equally. Furthermore, they don’t support audience singing at all. How do I know that? When I go to most of the churches that I have fixed in the past, when the attendance is around 90%, the congregation can drown out the pipe organ, the electronic organ, and the amplified worship team. Yes, it is possible for the congregation to drown out a sound system with professional Christian performers leading the music. That is what good acoustics can do in a worship space. When people try to sing like that in a concert hall, it sounds like chanting in a sporting event. It is not very musical and singing in four part harmony is out of the question. In a worship space, a well-motivated congregation can sing over 105dB with the sound system off when the acoustics are managed for congregational singing. If only the sound system could perform that loud without distortion and without the congregation complaining about the loudness.
Consider this, the invention of the sound system and its introduction into churches merely ushered in over time, the ability for contemporary worship, with the goal to get more people singing. Yes, many churches tried amplifying the choir as a means to get the congregation to sing, it didn’t work. When it came time for speaking, the sound system failed as well to amplify speech properly without feedback – This created a dilemma. To make the sound system perform better for speech, churches add absorptive flat panels, and that usually means killing the room, which in turn, discourages singing. The sound system was believed to be the solution to improving worship, but the truth is, the sound system can only amplify what the room allows. In this struggle between the sound system and church worship, no one looks at the room as being the limiting factor. Instead, observers and people asking whomever as to what can be done, the fingers point to the technology, the pastor, the song leader, and the soundmen who get all the blame. All of the other recommendations are meaningless until the room is fixed.
The only complaint this church has is that congregational singing is much louder up front.
As I mentioned earlier, I fix the sound in churches all over the world. Without changing the leadership, the pastor or song leaders, and without changing how worship is conducted, with the methods I use, most congregations go from 10 to 30% of the audience singing to 65 to 90% of the audience singing when the room is fixed. That happens because there is a way to make the room very responsive to exactly what people need to hear and feel during the singing portion of worship. At the same time, the same system improves the quality of speech, and as a bonus, the performance of the sound system increases substantially more. Doing church acoustics correctly, is being able to have a room that does both speech and congregational singing equally well. It also winds up being a good room for Christian concert and drama performances. Is it really possible to have a worship space that does everything well? Yes. Should you think that this is about a compromise? Think again, it is not.
The method of sound management that I have been using in churches is not of my design. I cannot take direct credit for these successes. I learned from an expert in Church sound. This sound management system that is now in over 450 churches, is the same method as originated by the hand that guided the fingers of King David, who designed King Solomon’s Temple. The acoustical system that I use is the same system that was designed by God. As I said, I can’t take credit for the success in the churches that have this system. Here is condensed version of how I learned about it.
Years ago, I had read or heard this verse in 1 Kings 6:29, which says that on all of the walls within and without, there were carvings of Cherubs, Palm Trees, and open flowers. Then one day and as the pastor was reading this passage from the pulpit, it dawned on me that the palm trees seemed out of place. They have no aesthetic value. There is no spiritual, nor ritual reason for having palm tree carvings on the wall. Then the acoustical knowledge I was learning at the time kicked in. If there was no acoustical treatment within the temple, the Levite Priests would have not been able to understand each other. That room would have been ringing well over 5 seconds. Under those conditions, even at 24 inches, the reverberation would have made it difficult to impossible to understand speech. It says that in the large room of the temple called the Holy Place, that the priests taught, they read the laws, they played musical instruments, they sang and prayed. They also did rituals that would have involved speaking. What was in the room that allowed them to do all of those activities, which are also the same actions we do in churches today?
After doing a lot of testing and experimenting, I discovered that the shape of the palm tree could be mimicked with cardboard, wood or plaster tubes which come in a range of costs, depending on how important aesthetics are and the budget your church can afford. This changes the performance of any existing church into a high-quality worship space that supports both congregational singing and speech. Before installing any churches with cardboard tubes, we tested a number of churches. For the first church tested with cardboard tubes, we used 10 and 12 foot long tubes, leaned them against the walls of a church and left them there for three weeks. At the end of three weeks, not only was speech so much better, but the number of people participating in congregational singing doubled. This was a huge surprise, and it was unexpected. We repeated this test in a dozen churches, and all of them had similar results. With those outcomes, I started recommending churches to use half-round tubes around their worship spaces, and every time as a new installation was completed, the results were almost all the same. (Let’s face it, some room shapes are better than others.) Speech improved, and congregational singing always was much better.
In most cases, at the 6th month follow up to an installation, the contact person would tell me two things. The first was an attendance increase. The second was that 65 to 90% of the congregations were singing every song. In most cases, there was no change in leadership, or order of worship or how singing was conducted. All of the deadspots in the room were gone. Now you could sit anywhere and sing out and feel like you are part of something big. Sometimes I also got glowing reviews of how the sound system was fixed when nothing was done to the system except for some equalization.
Since around 1994, over 450 churches have applied this method of managing the sound in their worship spaces. All of them have reported similar results. The interesting thing was, most of these churches didn’t hire me to fix their congregational singing. They hired me to improve the performance of their sound systems. They wanted better speech intelligibility. The half rounds tubes are the most cost-effective solution to improving the performance of any sound system. This method fixes the sound system much better than using any absorptive panel.
There is also a unique feature that half-round tubes have that no other acoustical system can do. The half-round tubes, when laid out in a specific pattern, can equalize a room. By adjusting the spacing, the sizes, and when using prime number sequences, if there is enough wall space, you can cut up to 40dB of excess sound energy from 50 to 1200 Hertz. If your worship space has excess energy, for example, at 400 Hertz and it feeds back there all the time, you can space the diffusers to cut out that frequency range. No other acoustical system in the world can do that. The most powerful acoustical system in the world comes from the Bible, and it is designed by God. Many people say that the Bible is sufficient in all things, and this is another example of that Biblical truth.
We have to stop blaming worship leaders, song leaders, and pastors for the lack of congregational singing. Saying things like changing the key to sing in or changing the order of music is blaming the worship leaders, and because of acoustics, all of their efforts cannot get any significant results because the room will cancel their efforts. Song leaders are always searching high and low for answers, and if you watch them carefully, they are constantly trying new things to get the congregation to engage more. Sure, for the short term, they might get an additional number of people singing, but after a few weeks, it goes back down to where it was before. It’s not that people don’t want to engage; it is because the room will not allow them to participate in group singing. This is the real reason why so many churches with contemporary worship styles have sanctuaries that are as good or better that performance clubs in Las Vegas. So many churches have turned to an entertainment style of worship. How un-Biblical is that!
On the internet, there are plenty of videos of young people in churches with hands up in the air and swaying to the music, but if you look closely, most of them are just mouthing the words, they are not singing. That is not worship. When what goes on in a sanctuary looks more like a rock concert, it is not church or worship. It is just clean, mostly unspiritual entertainment.
If there is any blame to go around, here is an uncomfortable truth. When I am hired to help a church, congregation members always tell me how, for years, they have been complaining to the church elders. Since churches are so reluctant to share their experiences about sound to other congregations, most church elders feel helpless because there are no standards for church sound and acoustics for them to turn to. When they ask consultants for help, they say, ask 10 sound guys what to do, and you get 10 different answers. This madness has to stop. The Bible has the answers to church sound, and it is a solution that is superior to any other system at any cost.
The best way to improve congregational singing is by fixing the worship space to the same standards as outlined in the Bible. In the end, this is the only option. If your church already has more than 65% of the audience singing, you are most likely not having an issue of the congregation being engaged in worship. For the rest of the churches out there, seek out what God can do for you. You don’t need an expert or acoustical consultant or sound system engineer to have a successful transformation. Churches can do this on their own. All you have to do is look at the examples on my website and copy whatever layout you see. If you need more help and can afford the cost of a consultant, hire one who understands the Biblical way to solve church sound problems and congregational singing. There is no mystery or formula or program when solving the congregational singing issue God’s way. Congregational singing is also a spiritual issue. It is what binds up together as believers. Stop solving spiritual problems using mans’ ways. God’s way always works. Don’t take my word for it. Trust God.